Posts Tagged ‘Score’
Temple Run 2 High Score 100,000,000 (100 Million – FULL) (iPod 5)
One hundred million full video and only a few deaths. i recorded this with screen recorder, there is no audio sadly,
Do you guys think I think i should ad…
Related Posts:
Perfect Score: Don’t Sweat the Technique – Eric B & Rakim (NBA Baller Beats) – Baller Difficulty
Old school, love the song, needs to be more Funk/Jazz-based Hip Hop, a la this and Grits’ old stuff. This song sampled Kool & the Gang (“Give it Up”) with a modified bassline, pretty sweet. Perfect 100% on everything, baller difficulty (hardest) on this song. NBA Baller Beats, pick it up for Xbox 360 Kinect! I’m thrilled the sensor picked this one up just fine. It gave me some nonregisters on Autobiotics, but not on this song. Ballin’! My ministry channel: www.youtube.com/crossallegiance Thanks for watching! God bless you.
Video Rating: 5 / 5
Incoming search terms:
- powered by SMF 2 0 job category is engineering jobs
- powered by SMF 2 0 lyrics cold play
- Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups cold play lyrics
- powered by SMF 2 0 hyde park
- powered by SMF hyde park
- powered by SMF 2 0 entertainment internships
- powered by SMF 2 0 poetry contests
- powered by SMF 2 0 wet t shirt contest
Related Posts:
The Site That Wants To Kill The Credit Score
A little-known lending program skirts financial institutions — and the credit agencies that police them.

Kiva, the online micro-lending organization, has been criticized for two main reasons: ignoring users in its own back yard and relying on middlemen loan institutions to manage money.
That’s, in part, why Kiva Zip exists.
Even in the United States, many of the microfinance institutions (MFIs) Kiva works with charge interest ranging from 4 to 10 percent (a rate the lender is hardly aware of). The average interest rate of MFIs Kiva uses overseas is much, much higher. Most of the MFIs are nonprofits using the interest rates to pay for overhead—but it still makes a dent. Plus, partnering with outside financial institutions brings baggage; namely, an an institutional aversion to risk.
Kiva Zip, a straight up peer-to-peer lending service launched in the United States and Kenya, takes out the MFIs entirely. It's still in early testing, and Kiva is keeping it somewhat on the down-low. But the service has already resulted in loans totaling $ 400,000 to 135 entrepreneurs in 28 states, as well as around 424 loans totaling $ 81,550 in Kenya.
The loans are zero-interest, and anyone is eligible, regardless of their credit score. To be listed on the site, the borrower only needs a vetted “trustee,” as Kiva calls them, whose relationship to the borrower can range from teacher from a work-training program to a pastor—or even someone who has successfully paid back their own Kiva Zip loan. Once the borrower has placed their profile on the site, anyone can click and give them a loan starting as low as $ 25. The trustee has no financial obligation if the loan isn't repaid; the system, like classic Kiva, relies mostly on trust.
“One big breakdown in the market is that credit scores are based on an algorithm that doesn't capture who you are,” says Kiva President Premal Shah. Instead of an algorithm, the loan is granted based on investors' own criteria — Yelp ratings, some subjective quality of the idea, their grades in a training program, the entrepreneur's personal character, or a simple hunch.
There's more than a hint of social media utopianism in what Kiva is doing. “You think about LinkedIn and social graph. It's all about who is connected to whom and who will vouch for whom,” says Shah. “Say you have a housekeeper. If you trust her with you keys, maybe you would vouch for her.”
It's a bit like the Kickstarter model, except the money gets paid back. Kiva's model is also naturally more inclusive; where Kickstarter favors good self-marketers with extensive online networks, Kiva only asks for a good word.
Take Victor Chicero, who grew up in a coffee-growing region in Mexico. When he came to the U.S. in 2001, he worked a series of odd jobs, eventually landing a gig at a coffee shop through the pastor at the local church. He didn't have formal education past the age of nine. But he wanted to open his own cafe, so Chicero took a course at the Mission Economy Development (MEDA), a small business incubator for Latinos in San Francisco. It was there that he found trustees for his posting on Kiva.

Via: zip.kiva.org
Chicero borrowed $ 5,000, opened Cafeto Coffee Shop, which was a success, and paid back the loan. He’s now signed up for another Kiva Zip loan to open a second location.
Based on Chicero's success, he is now able to vouch for other people in his neighborhood. Rocio Hernandez, a single mom from Mexico, was able to buy a car to expand her house cleaning business. Ernesto, who worked as a dishwasher when he first emigrated from El Salvador, was able to invest $ 5,000 in a taxi medallion. He has, in essence, built a tiny, ad-hoc credit ratings agency from scratch.
It remains to be seen what the cost of this altruism is. Credit scores, as ruthless as they can be, serve a purpose — so far, the repayment rate of Zip loans in the U.S. is 90.5 percent. Critics worry that the trustees' lack of material accountability limits their usefulness.
Incoming search terms:
Related Posts:
Smart TVs Fail To Score With Consumers In USA And Other Western Markets: GfK
Right here ’ s one reason why Apple could not be producing a television with its name blazoned on it in the near term: it doesn ’ t appearance like individuals have, up until now, shown that much thinking about them yet. According to a new report out from individual specialists GfK, connected TV televisions are shifting a lot better in markets like China, Brazil and India compared with the USA, UK and other developed markets — with China commanding the highest use at 44 % and the UK and USA leading advanced markets with merely 11 % penetration.
GfK places it down to customers in the latter classification stuck in an “ analog ” frame of mind — although individuals in the latter markets are also huge users of additional methods of getting the exact same experience without forking out for a costly connected TV set.
On top of set-top boxes from pay-TV service providers, there are consoles like the Xbox, Roku, and PlayStation that additionally supply on-demand and connected services to individuals through their TELEVISION sets. And gadgets like tablets and Computers, which are more matched to interactivity, are additionally showing to be among the fastest-growing gadgets for video clip viewing. And there is of course the raising multiscreen trend, where individuals use at the very least two devices at the exact same time to provide a simultaneous lean-back/lean-forward experience.
And there is additionally the issue of rate. A wise TV can cost upwards of $ 200 or more than a more basic set, and that could not even provide you a substantially better display than a cheaper make.
The supremacy of China in the connected TELEVISION group appears on the heels of a report last week from NPD that took note that China — or those in urban centers a minimum of — watch the most online video presentation content, around the most devices, of any other local group of consumers.
Individuals don ’ t care a lot about getting their Twitter fix right on the screen. GfK found that there seems to be little demand at the second for the kinds of bells and whistles that a lot of connected Televisions are supplying. Only 28 % of participants thought interactivity made programs more fascinating. Only 25 % thought tweeting and additional commenting styles make the experience more interesting.
“ Our findings suggest that broadcasters need to integrate their social factors far more engagingly into the fabric of the program, to encourage viewers to connect, ” writes Richard Preedy, Analysis Director at GfK. This certain study considered a total of 7,000 interviews from Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, UK, Russia, Turkey, Mexico, Brazil, USA, China, India and South Korea — 500 in each country except Belgium, where it collected 1,000,
On the additional hand, services that assisted individuals locate even more info on programs shifted a lot better: 33 % more viewers sought details on the shows they are viewing than usage social networks to share the experience with buddies, GfK composes.
Smart TVs go where PCs do not? It appears that wise TVs are faring a lot better in markets where COMPUTER penetration is lower: as they do with their mobiles, individuals in these markets as a result look to their Televisions to accomplish a couple of the functions that might have otherwise been accredited to the COMPUTER: 75 % of Chinese smart-TV managers used their TVs ’ complicated interactive attributes in previous month; in Western markets the ordinary number was less than half, GfK said.
That additionally seems to translate into buying objective, too: amongst USA and UK consumers, less than one-third (29 %; 26 % respectively) stated they would certainly try to find Internet-enabled TVs in the future. In China and India the numbers were respectively 64 % and 61 %.
Now additionally might be the time to strike while the iron is hot: just as Apple successfully developed an entire brand-new market for smartphones that were mainly the terrain of extremely early adopters and business individuals prior to the iPhone, it can might do the same for televisions. GfK takes note that sales of wise Televisions in the six biggest European economic situations were up by 31 % in the first half of this year.
It can be newer functions that may get users in these markets more considering brilliant Televisions: 67 % of respondents said they were interested in touch and motion control; and 43 % desire to control their Televisions with something other than a remote, such as a smartphone. Yes, these functions are currently right here and getting even more preferred all the time; the question is whether users will certainly planning to their TELEVISION sets or other gadgets to offer them longer term.
Related Posts:
More Women Than Men Use The Kindle Fire, And iPad Is Getting Highest Satisfaction Score: ComScore
The tablet market is still relatively young, with penetration in the fast-forward U.S. market only reaching 47% by 2013, but we are already starting to see some usage patterns emerging, according to comScore. In a survey of 6,000 tablet owners in the U.S., the researchers have found the Kindle Fire has more female than male users while iPad skews to males. It also found that Apple’s tablet has the highest satisfaction ratings of all tablets — although across iPad, Android and Kindle Fire tablets, all rate relatively close to each other, and all of them are higher than the average satisfaction ratings for smartphones.
And when assessing what motivates purchases, brands play second-fiddle to functionality and price, with apps availability, along with cost, scoring as the most important factors considered when a consumer purchases a tablet.
ComScore found that Amazon’s tablet has a customer base that is 56.6% female, the highest imbalance among iPad, Android and Amazon devices. The ‘why’ behind this finding is not addressed but it could have something to do with Amazon itself, being first and foremost a reading and shopping site, skews more to women, as we have also seen with its earlier Kindle E-Reader products. It’s also a funny coincidence that Amazon promotes the products with a woman’s hand (pictured).
The iPad attracted a 52.9% male audience, while Android tablets appeared to have the most evenly divided user base. In total, tablets as a general category are equally split between male and female owners. In comparison, smartphones seem to attract a slightly more male than female audience, at 51.9% to 48.1%.
When it comes to age, the 25-34 year-old bracket is the most-common for tablet and smartphone owners, regardless of the make; with the 35-44 segment the second most-popular. This shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise; this age range would hit the sweet spot of having enough disposable income to buy a product that can cost upwards of $ 199, and being digitally switched on than older users and possibly more sedentary than younger users. Also unsurprisingly, the most common income bracket for both tablet and smartphone owners are those consumers with a household income of over $ 100,000.
What’s perhaps more surprising is that even the Amazon Kindle, marketed as a price beater with its $ 199 tag, is largely following the same trend as more expensive tablets. That suggests that either Amazon’s $ 199 price is still too high for consumers with less money, or that tablets are still largely aimed at a particular kind of user that fits into a specific socioeconomic class — or likely both.
Turning to what gets users to buy tablets, comScore found that on average apps availability and price are just as important as each other to consumers. (That should quiet those who say apps are secondary to the web.) That result varied among different categories — for example the more expensive but app-tastic iPad scored higher for apps than the largely cheaper Android and Kindle Fire tablets. It seems to indicate that if Apple did launch a cheaper device but with most of the same functionality, it could potentially blow all the others out of the water.
Still, today brand name/tablet OS are both a close second. The fact that consumers are so aware of the OS is interesting to me: it seems once more to indicate we are still looking at early adopters here. Interestingly services like music, video and social networking are broken out from apps, and all score lower on their own.
Lastly, in the area of device satisfaction, Apple’s iPad, the most popular tablet in the market today, scored the very highest. But not with as wide a margin as you would assume, given its market share. Apple had an 8.8 on a scale of 1-10, but the Kindle Fire was nearly as good with an 8.7 rating. Interestingly the un-forked Android tablets scored the lowest at 8.2, but that category will contain a very wide range of models. Similarly, the catch-all category of smartphones also showed a comparatively low score of 8.1.
Incoming search terms:
- powered by myBB modern art for sale
- Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups the unit full episodes
- powered by SMF women networking groups
- powered by SMF american literature terms
- powered by myBB african american art for sale
- Powered by Article Dashboard a world history of photography
- powered by myBB importance of related literature
- Powered by Article Dashboard body shop
- powered by SMF forward health
- Powered by Article Dashboard black and white fantasy art
Related Posts:
Even more Ladies Than Guy Use The Kindle Fire, And iPad Is Getting Highest Satisfaction Score: ComScore
The tablet market is still pretty young, with penetration in the fast-forward UNITED STATE market only reaching 47 % by 2013, however we are already starting to see some utilization patterns arising, according to comScore. In a study of 6,000 tablet managers in the UNITED STATE, the research workers have found the Kindle Fire has more female than male users while iPad skews to males. It also located that Apple ’ s tablet has the highest satisfaction ratings of all tablets — although around iPad, Android and Kindle Fire tablets, all rate relatively close to each additional, and all of them are higher than the typical contentment ratings for smartphones.
And when analyzing what inspires acquisitions, brand names play second-fiddle to functionality and price, with applications accessibility, along with price, scoring as the most vital aspects thought about when a customer acquisitions a tablet.
ComScore located that Amazon ’ s tablet has a client base that is 56.6 % female, the highest discrepancy amongst iPad, Android and Amazon gadgets. The ‘ why ’ behind this finding is not addressed but it could have something to do with Amazon itself, being first and foremost a reading and shopping website, skews even more to females, as we have additionally seen with its earlier Kindle E-Reader products. It ’ s additionally a funny coincidence that Amazon promotes the items with a lady ’ s hand (pictured).
The iPad brought in a 52.9 % male audience, while Android tablets appeared to have the most evenly divided user base. In overall, tablets as a basic group are equally split between male and female managers. In comparison, smartphones appear to bring in a slightly more male than female audience, at 51.9 % to 48.1 %.
When it pertains to age, the 25-34 year-old bracket is the most-common for tablet and smartphone owners, regardless of the make; with the 35-44 segment the second most-popular. This shouldn ’ t come as excessive of a surprise; this age variety would hit the sweet spot of having enough non reusable income to buy a product that can cost upwards of $ 199, and being digitally turned on than more outdated individuals and perhaps more inactive than younger individuals. Even unsurprisingly, the most common income bracket for both tablet and smartphone owners are those individuals with a home income of over $ 100,000.
Exactly what ’ s probably more unexpected is that also the Amazon Kindle, marketed as a price beater with its $ 199 tag, is mainly following the exact same trend as more pricey tablets. That suggests that either Amazon ’ s $ 199 price is still too high for individuals with less money, or that tablets are still largely intended at a specific kind of individual that fits into a particular socioeconomic class — or likely both.
Resorting to exactly what gets individuals to buy tablets, comScore located that on typical applications accessibility and price are just as crucial as each additional to consumers. (That should peaceful those who say applications are secondary to the internet.) That outcome varied amongst different categories — for instance the more expensive however app-tastic iPad scored greater for applications than the mostly cheaper Android and Kindle Fire tablets. It appears to suggest that if Apple did introduce a less costly tool but with most of the exact same functionality, it might possibly blow all the others from the water.
Still, today brand name/tablet OS are both a close second. The fact that consumers are so conscious of the OS is fascinating to me: it seems when even more to indicate we are still considering very early adopters here. Remarkably services like songs, video recording and social networking are broken out from apps, and all score lower on their very own.
Finally, in the area of gadget total satisfaction, Apple ’ s iPad, the most preferred tablet in the market today, scored the very greatest. However not with as large a margin as you would certainly presume, given its market share. Apple had an 8.8 on a scale of 1-10, however the Kindle Fire was almost as good with an 8.7 score. Remarkably the un-forked Android tablets scored the most affordable at 8.2, however that category will contain a very comprehensive variety of styles. Similarly, the catch-all group of smartphones also showed a comparatively reduced score of 8.1.
Related Posts:
More Females Than Men Use The Kindle Fire, And iPad Is Getting Highest Fulfillment Score: ComScore
The tablet market is still fairly young, with penetration in the fast-forward USA market just reaching 47 % by 2013, but we are currently beginning to see some usage patterns emerging, asing reported by comScore. In a survey of 6,000 tablet owners in the USA, the specialists have discovered the Kindle Fire has more female than male individuals while iPad skews to males. It even discovered that Apple ’ s tablet has the highest contentment scores of all tablets — although around iPad, Android and Kindle Fire tablets, all price fairly close to each other, and all of them are higher than the typical contentment scores for smartphones.
And when evaluating exactly what motivates purchases, brand names play second-fiddle to functionality and rate, with apps availability, along with expense, scoring as the most vital elements thought about when a consumer acquisitions a tablet.
ComScore found that Amazon ’ s tablet has a consumer base that is 56.6 % female, the highest discrepancy amongst iPad, Android and Amazon gadgets. The ‘ why ’ behind this locating is not taken care of but it could have something to do with Amazon itself, being first and leading a reading and shopping site, skews even more to women, as we have additionally seen with its earlier Kindle E-Reader items. It ’ s also an amusing coincidence that Amazon promotes the products with a lady ’ s hand (imagined).
The iPad drew in a 52.9 % male audience, while Android tablets appeared to have the most uniformly divided individual base. In total, tablets as a basic classification are equally split between male and female owners. In contrast, smartphones appear to draw in a slightly more male than female audience, at 51.9 % to 48.1 %.
When it pertains to age, the 25-34 year-old bracket is the most-common for tablet and smartphone managers, regardless of the make; with the 35-44 portion the 2nd most-popular. This shouldn ’ t come as too much of a surprise; this age array would hit the sweet spot of having enough non reusable earnings to get a product that can cost upwards of $ 199, and being digitally turned on than older individuals and possibly more non-active than younger individuals. Also unsurprisingly, the most typical income bracket for both tablet and smartphone owners are those consumers with a home income of over $ 100,000.
Exactly what ’ s possibly more unexpected is that even the Amazon Kindle, marketed as a cost beater with its $ 199 tag, is mostly following the same trend as more costly tablets. That recommends that either Amazon ’ s $ 199 rate is still too high for consumers with less cash, or that tablets are still largely intended at a certain kind of user that fits into a certain socioeconomic class — or most likely both.
Relying on what gets individuals to get tablets, comScore located that on typical applications accessibility and price are just as crucial as each additional to consumers. (That should quiet those who say applications are secondary to the internet.) That outcome differed among different classifications — for example the more expensive however app-tastic iPad scored higher for apps than the largely less costly Android and Kindle Fire tablets. It appears to indicate that if Apple did launch a more affordable tool however with many of the exact same capability, it can possibly blow all the others out of the water.
Still, today brand name name/tablet OS are both a close second. The fact that consumers are so aware of the OS is interesting to me: it seems as soon as even more to indicate we are still considering early adopters right here. Interestingly services like popular music, video and social networking are broken out from applications, and all score lower on their very own.
Lastly, in the location of gadget satisfaction, Apple ’ s iPad, the most prominent tablet in the market today, scored the incredibly highest. However not with as comprehensive a margin as you would certainly assume, offered its market share. Apple had an 8.8 on a scale of 1-10, however the Kindle Fire was nearly as really good with an 8.7 score. Interestingly the un-forked Android tablets scored the most reasonable at 8.2, but that category will certainly include a really wide variety of styles. Likewise, the catch-all classification of smartphones additionally showed a relatively reduced score of 8.1.
Related Posts:
Even more Females Than Guy Use The Kindle Fire, And iPad Is Getting Highest Satisfaction Score: ComScore
The tablet market is still relatively young, with penetration in the fast-forward USA market only reaching 47 % by 2013, but we are already beginning to see some utilization patterns arising, asing reported by comScore. In a study of 6,000 tablet managers in the U.S., the research workers have actually found the Kindle Fire has more female than male individuals while iPad skews to males. It even located that Apple ’ s tablet has the greatest contentment ratings of all tablets — although around iPad, Android and Kindle Fire tablets, all rate pretty close to each other, and all of them are higher than the average contentment ratings for smartphones.
And when assessing what encourages acquisitions, brands play second-fiddle to performance and price, with apps accessibility, along with cost, scoring as the most vital aspects thought about when an individual acquisitions a tablet.
ComScore discovered that Amazon ’ s tablet has a customer base that is 56.6 % female, the greatest imbalance amongst iPad, Android and Amazon gadgets. The ‘ why ’ behind this locating is not addressed but it could possibly have something to do with Amazon itself, being first and leading a reading and shopping site, skews more to women, as we have actually additionally seen with its earlier Kindle E-Reader products. It ’ s additionally an amusing coincidence that Amazon promotes the items with a woman ’ s hand (envisioned).
The iPad brought in a 52.9 % male audience, while Android tablets appeared to have the most uniformly divided individual base. In overall, tablets as a general classification are equally split between male and female owners. In comparison, smartphones seem to entice a slightly more male than female audience, at 51.9 % to 48.1 %.
When it comes to age, the 25-34 year-old bracket is the most-common for tablet and smartphone managers, regardless of the make; with the 35-44 section the 2nd most-popular. This shouldn ’ t come as excessive of a surprise; this age array would hit the sweet spot of having enough non reusable earnings to buy a product that can cost upwards of $ 199, and being digitally switched over on than more outdated individuals and possibly more sedentary than more youthful individuals. Additionally unsurprisingly, the most typical income bracket for both tablet and smartphone managers are those individuals with a family income of over $ 100,000.
Just what ’ s probably more surprising is that even the Amazon Kindle, marketed as a price beater with its $ 199 tag, is mostly following the same trend as more pricey tablets. That proposes that either Amazon ’ s $ 199 rate is still too high for consumers with less cash, or that tablets are still mostly aimed at a specific kind of individual that fits into a certain socioeconomic class — or likely both.
Turning to exactly what gets users to purchase tablets, comScore found that on ordinary applications accessibility and price are simply as crucial as each additional to individuals. (That ought to quiet those who say applications are secondary to the internet.) That outcome varied among different classifications — for instance the more expensive but app-tastic iPad scored greater for applications than the largely less expensive Android and Kindle Fire tablets. It appears to indicate that if Apple did launch a less expensive tool but with many of the exact same performance, it can potentially blow all the others from the water.
Still, today brand name name/tablet OS are both a close second. The fact that individuals are so aware of the OS is fascinating to me: it appears once even more to show we are still looking at very early adopters here. Interestingly services like songs, video and social networking are broken out from applications, and all score lower by themselves.
Finally, in the location of device satisfaction, Apple ’ s iPad, the most prominent tablet in the market today, scored the very greatest. However not with as large a margin as you would presume, provided its market share. Apple had an 8.8 on a scale of 1-10, however the Kindle Fire was almost as good with an 8.7 rating. Remarkably the un-forked Android tablets scored the lowest at 8.2, but that group will certainly contain an extremely broad range of designs. Likewise, the catch-all category of smartphones also showed a somewhat inexpensive score of 8.1.
Related Posts:
Cat Beating On Automatic Feeder To Score Extra Food

Because the internet is drier than dry cat food, here’s a video of Milo the cat beating the shit out of his automatic cat feeder to get it to drop some extra fish-shaped kibble. Mmmm, the fish shapes are my favorite too.
We have two cats, Milo (tabby) and Max (black). They are one year old brothers from the same litter. Milo is a big fan of the dry food, Max not so much. Despite the fact that their automatic feeder drops food 3 times daily, Milo smashes into it with his front paws 20-30 times each day in order to knock out some extra snacks. Max has never smashed the feeder.
See? And you all thought I was crazy for pounding on my computer every time the internet goes out. “But Milo actually gets something for his effort — banging on your computer doesn’t do anything.” Yes it does too! “What?” Makes me feel good.
Hit the jump for the clever cat in action, bonus slap-fight midway through.
Incoming search terms:
- Powered by Article Dashboard exterior paint reviews
- Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups exterior paint reviews
- Powered by Article Dashboard sport bike videos
- Powered by Article Dashboard sport bike
- powered by SMF home exterior paint
- Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups gm part
- Powered by Article Dashboard scores
- Powered by Article Dashboard pet food
- Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups exterior painting
- Powered by Article Dashboard dry cat food
Related Posts:
ZTE X500 Score – Black (Cricket) Android Smartphone – New sealed in the box!
HTC EVO 4G - Black (Sprint) Smartphone
| | $20.00 (1 Bid) End Date: Tuesday May-21-2013 17:19:22 PDT Buy It Now for only: $150.00 Buy It Now | Bid now | Add to watch list |
New 4.0" Multi-touch Android 4.0 Dual Sim WIFI Smartphone AT&T T-Mobile Unlocked
| | $63.95 End Date: Monday May-27-2013 19:22:44 PDT Buy It Now for only: $63.95 Buy It Now | Add to watch list |
HTC Droid Incredible Verizon Wireless Wifi 8.0 MP Camera 8GB Android Cell Phone
| | $64.95 End Date: Wednesday Jun-19-2013 10:07:32 PDT Buy It Now for only: $64.95 Buy It Now | Add to watch list |

