Posts Tagged ‘method’
Apple is moving fast on securing intellectual property related to the making and usage of sapphire glass, filing another patent related to the material recently that has been published by the USPTO today (via AppleInsider). Previously we saw Apple file a patent for a method of attaching sapphire glass display windows to a device, and now its looking to insure that its method for manufacturing and shaping the material into forms usable in gadgets are legally protected.
The patent is fairly technical, describing how sapphire can be grown, the collected and polished down into wafers, as well as treated with various coatings including oleophobic coatings (the kind used on the iPhone to prevent fingerprints) and ink masking (presumably to enable printing of logos and other elements on the sapphire). Sapphire is a difficult material to work with in terms of manufacturing electronics, since it’s hardness makes traditional methods of cutting and shaping it more challenging.
Apple’s methods include using lasers to cut the sapphire into usable chunks, and it specifically mentions smartphone displays as one potential application. To get the material to where it needs to be for use in assembling phones and other devices, it describes a means by which it’s grown and then turned into cores which can be sliced into wafers. Those wafers can be sliced using lasers, which is both cleaner and faster than using machine grinding, which could be a clue into how Apple plans to make manufacturing sapphire components at scale cost-efficient.
A new report from 9to5Mac says that Apple is keen on ramping up its sapphire manufacturing plant in Arizona, which it will be running with GT Advanced Technologies as part of a $ 578 million deal. The facility should be live by February, according to 9to5Mac, and it will aid in producing “a new sub-component of Apple products,” say documents obtained by the blog. An earlier report also said that Apple manufacturing partner Foxconn was already doing test production runs using sapphire glass screens in assembling iPhones.
Apple gearing up for sapphire use on both the IP and the manufacturing front is a pretty safe sign that we’ll see this component feature prominently in future designs. In terms of timing, it’s likely that at this point we’ll have to wait until late this year before anything reaches consumers, but the wheels are turning, and the result could be much more durable devices.
Photo courtesy flickr user Joey DeVilla.
So, you were trying to pee and text at the same time and what happened? You peed on the floor for ten seconds before realizing it, trailing across your shoes, then finally hitting the urinal and backsplashing your pants. You’re a wreck. So what do you do? While you’re washing your hands you splash a little water around the bottom of your shirt, then when you get back to your date you complain about how insane the water pressure at the men’s room sink is. We’ve all been there. But now physicists at at Brigham Young University have suggested a method for urinal use that minimizes backsplash. If you shit yourself though you should still sneak out the kitchen and convince yourself your date wasn’t the girl for you.
Men should stand as close to the urinal as possible… Also helpful is directing the stream to hit the back of the urinal at a downward angle. That creates less splash-back and the drops that do bounce, head downwards into the urinal drain. Conversely, to prevent messing one’s trousers (or angering neighbors) they suggest men not spray directly into the urinal or into the pool that forms at the bottom of the urinal, both cause a lot of splash-back.
So as close to the urinal as possible and downward. That kind of goes against the common sense of standing as far away from the urinal as possible, but what do I know? I’m just a man who’s been practicing his bank shot off the urinal divider. “How’s that working out for you?” Honestly? If peeing were a basketball game I probably wouldn’t be a starter. Keep going for a video tutorial of how to prevent a double dribble.
Note: Larger version right HERE provided I didn’t accidentally upload a picture of me peeing on a frenemy’s car door handle like I did last time.
For all you steak lovers out there, here’s an infographic showing all the different cuts of beef, their general cost, and suggested cooking methods. Study it good. That way the next time you’re at a restaurant and your date orders some form of round steak, you can confidently say, “Solid choice, honey — that particular cut comes from right around the cow’s asshole.”
Thanks to Tal, who agrees the best cut isn’t from a cow at all, it’s from a cake. Somebody red velvet me, pronto.
Apple had a new patent application released by the USPTO today, explaining an unlocking technique for digital devices that uses image recognition to properly acknowledge an authorized individual. The system would present an individual with pictures from their iPhoto or iCloud collections, and then ask them to determine who or exactly what the topic is in order to open the gadget. The item in concern might likewise be an object or series of images.
The authorization process would work by displaying a minimum of one image to be recognized from the user ’ s library, though it might likewise show a number in succession if individuals are seeking more protection. It ’ s very most likely that somebody near to you will recognize another specific depicted in photos on your phone, for example, but if you ’ re stressed over giving gain access to even to that inner circle of associates, it becomes increasingly unlikely they ’ ll be able to identify each of a series of even more than one picture.
Different methods of input are also explained in the patent, from a numerous selection list of choices for one-tap entry, to making use of an on-screen (on an iOS gadget) or physical keyboard (on a Mac) to enter the precise answer, to simply speaking the name of the individual or object aloud. Combined with voice recognition, you could see how the third option would offer yet another layer of included, individualized safety, which would be really tough to beat via conventional machine-based security workaround devices.
If the system uses things rather of people, the patent describes a process by which users would provide one-of-a-kind, alternative nicknames for identifiable monuments and spots. So, for instance, a picture of the Eiffel Tower could really be connected to the phrase “ The Big Stick. ” Since nobody else is most likely to use fairly the same idiosyncratic alternate names for highly recognizable objects, the system should remain relatively secure.
In many cases, Apple ’ s current passcode unlock system is most likely sufficient for the demands of users, however ought to the business wish to meet the needs of privacy sensitive users, an approach like this that ’ s very personal and hard to hack could possibly be of significant advantage.
The curved displays of Samsung’s Nexus S and Galaxy Nexus helped them attract attention in the smartphone group, however it’s clearer than ever that the company does not have a lock on the concept. Apple is checking out the idea as well: it simply received a patent for a method that molds thin glass into bent or curved shapes without a drawn-out process or using high-risk chemicals. By having alignment devices reposition in addition to hotter temperatures during a glass slumping procedure, where the material shapes itself around a mold, Apple could flex glass without any disturbance– resulting in curvy surfaces that are both quicker to make and higher quality. A patent doesn’t mean that we’ll see a curved iPhone in the immediate future, though. Apple leaves its options open and suggests that anything from mice to TVs can be candidates, must the business react at all. If the patent ever before applies to real-world items, nevertheless, we’ll have a hint regarding exactly how the bendy forms came to be.
New Root Technique Released for Verizon ' s Galaxy S3 Running Jelly Bean
With the official Jelly Bean (Android 4.1.1) update out for Verizon ' s variation of the Galaxy S3, we can imagine that some of you could have lost root at the same time. Thankfully, an updated method to unlock the bootloader on the gadget (if you haven ' t …
Review more on Droid Life
Paperland Pro LWP Wintertime Update– It ' s Santa Flying High
The developers of Paperland live wallpaper are certainly feeling that Christmas spirit, as they have actually updated the Pro version of their application. Inside, you will observe one significant distinction– Santa! In addition to pretty lights lining the trees and individuals …
Read more on Droid Life
HTC dumps plans for Windows Phone 8 mobile phone with DROID DNA-sized display
HTC last month pushed the mobile phone limits when it presented the DROID DNA, which has a 5-inch screen with a 1080p resolution. The business had actually prepared to introduce a Windows device with a 5-inch display next year, however CEO Peter Chou axed …
Check out more on Mobile Burn
Google revealed an entirely new line of Nexus devices in an assortment of forms and sizes, from the Nexus 4 smartphone to the Nexus 10 tablet, and some aspects of the product launch showed complicated. Why construct a mobile phone with modern-day specifications across the board, then leave out LTE connection? Or why push much more and enhanced Nexus tablet equipment, when there ’ s an unexpected paucity of applications designed for those screens? A new interview by the NYT ’ s Brian X. Chen with John Lagerling, Google ’ s Director of Business Development for Android, supplies some answers to those questions, and lights up how Google approaches its signature Nexus line of gadgets.
The bottom line is that what Google desires to do with Nexus is a totally different thing from Apple ’ s method with its own iOS hardware, or, for that matter, from the goals of other OEMs creating Android devices. Lagerling experiences the standard checklist of specifications and features on the Nexus 4 and chats up pushing the envelope in terms of delivering enhanced storage options at existing price points on Nexus 7 tablets, but the real meat of the story comes when he ’ s experienced with a concern about the paltry selection in terms of specialized tablet apps on Google Play, and rather of answering directly, launches into a discussion of the overall point of the Nexus program:
I don’t have a number for exactly how lots of apps are effectively adding those APIs that you have to put totally to utilize the extra display realty. Just what I can easily state is that the Nexus 7 has been a superstrong catalyst to kick off developers’ attention to making those expansions, so we have actually seen remarkable growth in applications for the bigger screen size. The trending is extremely good since of the Nexus 7.
However previously, I’ll be sincere and say, yes, there was a lack of tablet applications that supported larger display real estate. However I’ll include that, I know we spoke about the Cupertino men, but undoubtedly people who have smartphones are a huge target for us. If you look worldwide that’s something we worry much more about, not so much about contending with other mobile phones, but a lot more about, exactly how can we get more people onto the Internet on mobile phones? And that’s a huge offer. That’s why reasonable expense is so important.
Lagerling also stated in reference to current declarations by Asus relating to Nexus 7 sales that Google doesn ’ t release numbers, and doesn ’ t typically enable its equipment partners to either. He said just that the Nexus 7 has actually “ offered method above expectations, ” with the caveat that either means it ’ s offering effectively or that Google had extremely reasonable expectations to begin with, without hinting at which situation was more likely.
The obvious objective of the Nexus program is then not to offer the many of any sort of single kind of device, however to drive costs for quality hardware to the point where it becomes generally available. And while Lagerling didn ’ t straight take care of the Nexus 4 ′ s lack of LTE in the interview, seen in the context of a company trying to strike a balance between power and affordability, that omission makes a great deal even more sense. Google ’ s Nexus program is an experimental path towards mobile internet universality; the end goal is to increase its core product productivity by getting as numerous eyes on Google software products as possible, however in the interim, that doesn ’ t require that any of its Nexus gadgets always become breakout hits. The point is to drive expenses down, do a lot more with less, discover what individuals look at necessary in a mobile device and evolve the Nexus line till it comes to be both inexpensive and appealing to every person.
Whereas Apple ’ s items have to be a hit to justify the business ’ s expenditures on their development, Google ’ s hardware need just produce experimentally purposeful feedback. The search and software company has the resources and sturdy OEM collaborations to make Nexus a global-scale field test in affordable mobile computing, and that ’ s a frightening proposition for rivals whose item development methods are based on more typical revenue and profitability demands.
Incoming search terms:
- Powered by Article Dashboard motion and motion in minnesota
- Powered by Article Dashboard bt paintball upgrades
Google Billfold got a lot better earlier this month when it added support for all significant credit and debit cards, and now it looks like Google is riding that energy to get yet another partner. Discover has apparently been wooed by Pocketbook, and has actually now established a page on its website for members to include their card to the app straight from their Discover account– with no requirement to type in that card number, termination date, and protection code. In addition, Discover has actually passed along its credit card art to Google for usage in the app, and those working on gathering perks points will certainly be happy to hear that you’ll still get those points when making use of billfold.
Sure, those are all slight advantages at finest, but exactly what’s even more substantial is that …
Incoming search terms:
Google’s SPDY process is currently getting grip among internet browsing heavyweights such as Chrome and Firefox, however its next action may be its biggest showing to date– albeit in a different kind. Asing reported by Mark Nottingham, the chairperson of the committee behind the HTTP process, a choice was made to focus on SPDY as the starting point for HTTP/2.0 discussion. Now, in case you could not advise, this is far from a sure thing, and as is, the HTTPBIS Working Group is presently targeting 2014 for the brand-new spec’s release. The decision is crucial, nonetheless, as the group appears intent to not transform the wheel with HTTP/2.0.
While Nottingham made it clear that SPDY wouldn’t form a straight-out replacement for HTTP– for instance, the “methods, status codes, and many of the headers” will continue to be the same– there’s now a high possibility that SPDY will heavily affect the new method. Up next, Nottingham will open the discussion to the group’s mailing list, and after that, approval will be looked for from the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). As soon as those actions are out of the way, however, we can expect work to start in earnest to the progression of HTTP/2.0, and hopefully, a whole lot of rapid impacts.
Filed under: InternetHTTP standards group plannings to SPDY method to affect HTTP/2.0 originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 07Aug 2012 07:48:00 EDT. Please see our terms for usage of feeds. Permalink TechCrunch |. MNot’s Blog|E-mail this|Opinions
Magic, they call it. And without a doubt we could include an appendix to that old saw: any sort of adequately advanced, or adequately rare, modern technology is indistinguishable from magic.
You have to understand the tale of the Mechanical Turk. Exactly how princes and tradesmen were surprised by this innovative device ’ s capability to play chess intelligently. In an age of heavy steam and brass hinges! Yet at the time thousands were fooled. Had they understood a bit more about machines, they could have realized it was not simply improbable, but impossible.
The Mechanical Turks of our day aren ’ t created for enjoyment, however to be purchased and used, yet a comparable goes into avoiding the formulas of their operation from being questioned. In fact, we are already at a time where it is basically inconceivable for one person to comprehend or question them. Apple might be ahead of the curve on this trend, however while it appears they ’ ve been leading the industry by the nose, they in turn are being led by the inexorable forward movement of innovation. Open hardware proponents battle the excellent match, and they battle it valiantly, but defeat is inevitable.
And just what might triumph be, exactly? A laptop computer you can mend in the convenience of your residence? Noises good, to be sure– but exactly how deep does that capacity truly go? If your disk drive breaks or your RAM is corrupted, will you pull out a magnifying glass and correct the defective fields with your electron punch? Readjust the drive head in your billion-dollar mend toolshop out back? No, you ’ ll order a new drive, new RAM, a brand-new screen.
RAM utilized to be pieces too, you know. In an outstanding (so far) book about the origins of the home computer, Turing ’ s Cathedral, the mechanical nature of early computing equipments is presented for your humble contemplation. ENIAC, for example, had 17,468 vacuum cleaner tubes, 1500 relays, and 500,000 hand-soldered joints. Operation was complicated, however mechanical: if you weren ’ t cautious, you might get your finger caught in the RAM. If something broke, you required a wrench. Now a stored bit takes up so little space that if it gets a lot smaller it will end to be governed by Newtonian physics.
This is the genuine problem. Modern technology in fact is approaching the magic point. You wish to know just how your laptop works. You can easily ’ t recognize. Also the individuals that made it don ’ t understand. Apple needs to call LG or Sharp when it wants a high-density display. LG needs to call Samsung when they would like MLC flash storage. Samsung needs to call NVIDIA when they want graphics cores. NVIDIA has to call ARM to make SoC architecture. Vertical integration is a thing of the past due to the fact that no company can do it all. It took Intel 5 years and billions of dollars to establish merely the processor your laptop computer runs today. The whole system is the height of a century of work by geniuses and professionals. Control over your hardware is the flimsiest of optical illusions. You just comprehend the snow frosting the top of the iceberg, and also then all you can easily do to fix it is pay for more.
But that ’ s a bit of an academic (and existential) appraisal of the topic. Realistically speaking, there are better and poorer methods of producing a laptop computer, means that make it easy for such a machine to last for five years as an alternative of two, or to make it possible for upgrades that cost a few hundred instead of a thousand dollars. The new Macs are, by some standards, the worst yet made.
Even this is on its way out, though. Integration and mobility are the word now, not modularity, a minimum of for the large majority of individuals. Mobiles and tablets use SoC architecture that consolidates reasoning, graphics, music, and additional functions all under the exact same chip for reasons of compatibility and power cost savings. I ’ ve constructed my very own PCs for years, and I anticipate I ’ ll quite possibly construct one or two more, but also now it ’ s anachronistic, a minimum of at the individual degree. Modular and open hardware (such as it is) will definitely continue to exist, however as prior to they will just funnel into more functional, closed systems.
We ’ ve made this surrender many times. We surrendered control of our government to representatives considering that it ’ s more desirable to have a couple of (seemingly) informed people whose (nominal) responsibility it is to govern on our part. We surrendered control over our vehicles years ago with electronically controlled fuel shot and timings, with parts we couldn ’ t fix or also reach, because it enhances mileage and reliability. We surrendered control over the method we socialize when we determined we ’ d utilize Facebook and text messages, since it ’ s beneficial and fun. Each time we make a little bargain: we control less and we get more. Is anyone shocked it ’ s happening again?
We ought to certainly have the ability to do what we prefer after the fact. We can impeach our representatives, adjust our timings, and make use of Facebook to organize anti-Facebook rallies. And we can easily and should run our very own programs, our own operating systems, do exactly what we will certainly with the platform we ’ ve bought.
The greatest threat is not to hardware, which has in fact been beyond the comprehension of users for years, but to exactly what we are enabled to do with it. Apple can easily solder their RAM and seal it with custom screws all they want. They are just producing the medium and in this case, the medium is not the message. Their home computers are more locked down than others, however we mustn ’ t underestimate precisely how locked down the others currently were.
More uncomfortable is the deeper marital relationship we are seeing between hardware and software program. How several OS X and iOS-specific operations do you think lie below the placid mask of the A5 processor? Precisely how long prior to locked bootloaders and UEFI and knowledgeable cable televisions avoid you from setting up a new OS or streaming from non-approved sources?
For that matter, with virtualization of services and externalization of storage, precisely how many actions are we adding between ourselves and the things we make use of? Running the software we desire, even if it was on hardware we don ’ t recognize, was just one of our last strongholds. And now “ our ” computer software is running on other individuals ’ s hardware, people who give it to you for free of charge and in return we … what, precisely? We do not question that close to enough.
The match is not to control the hardware. The hardware has actually been out of our control for a very long time. Regardless of that, hardware today, more complicated and inaccessible than ever in the past, is more allowing and powerful than ever previously. If you want a battle, don ’ t battle against technological development, which regularly moves these things ever before further out of your grasp. Whether you or Apple has to change the drive or screen in your brand-new MacBook Pro is immaterial. Whether Apple, or Amazon, or the MPAA, can easily stop you from utilizing it the way you like is not. Forget the soldered RAM; there are those that would solder you down offered a chance. They are the ones to fear, and for that reason the ones to fight.