Posts Tagged ‘Expectations’
When Kickstarter Delivers: Thanks To Simple, Effective Design, Supr’s Slim Wallet Exceeds Expectations
I’ve backed an embarrassing amount of Kickstarter projects, almost all of them in the hardware/gadget categories, and I’ve been disappointed more than I’ve been delighted. The Slim wallet by Supr however bucks the trend, delivering a front-pocket wallet that finally and truly deserves the honor of actually being carried in that place.
Minneapolis-based Supr Good Co. initially launched the Slim in August, with a funding goal of just $ 10,000 and an estimated shipping date of September for their minimalist wallet design, which essentially is just an elastic sheath measuring only 3mm thick. The U.S.-made wallet still boasts classic good looks despite its simplicity, however, thanks to a striking contrast-stitched “X” front-and-center where the two ends of the elastic material used in its construction meet.
Because of the wallet’s simplicity, a reviewer like myself doesn’t need to mince words: this is pretty much a perfect slim wallet for those who want just the basics in a lightweight, convenient package. I carry just four cards and some bills, all of which tuck in to the Slim snugly in a way that leaves me confident nothing is going to accidentally fall out or go missing. It manages to be slimmer than the Fossil front pocket wallet it replaces, and a lot lighter, too. I’ve also varied the number of cards I’ve had in there over the past week, and so far, the elastic shows no sign of excess stretch or an inability to return to holding fewer cards securely.
Supr missed their original shipping target by a fair margin, but they were very transparent about their reasons for doing so, and they did also eventually deliver a terrific product. The online shop hasn’t officially opened yet, but you can register your interest for the Slim when it does start to ship to the general public. Kickstarter may not have the security of ordering gadgets from established companies, but when it works, it results in some amazing stuff that you aren’t likely to be able to pick up elsewhere.
Incoming search terms:
- Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups sport trac parts
- powered by phpBB performance based interview questions
- Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups web audio search
- Powered by Article Dashboard universal skating center
- powered by phpBB apple computer reviews
- Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups first spiritual science church
- Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups first spiritual science church in denver
- Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups non performance based acquisition
- Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups microsoft corp
- Powered by Article Dashboard first spiritual science church - denver
While I ’ m loath to indicate licensed Apple nerds like Marco Arment and Gruber in regards to Windows Surface (in this case the RT edition) I think it ’ s crucial that all of us take an action back and asses what really happened: Microsoft hurried to market with a product that was, at best, inferior.
To be clear, I think the type element is the future of computing. I concur with Jeff Atwood that the Area has actually goosed the moribund laptop market and that the addition of a keyboard to a more effective tablet is the means forward.
I ’ ve utilized devices running stock Win 8 and despite the apparent detach between Metro (I ’ m calling it Metro due to the fact that it sounds cooler) and Pc, I locate Win8 to be a solid OS and a fantastic advance. General approval will be slow-moving, however the value proposition, especially in unifying the Win8/WinPhone globes, is there.
But right here we go: Microsoft, in their ham-handed way, introduced their worst product initially. And the die-hards are out in force raving against the unjust treatment RT received at the hands of critics who are quite certainly in Apple ’ s pocket (like our very own Matt Burns who has utilized Windows for most of his career). Even Marco attests that the equipment is beautiful however the processor is too slow and the OS to wonky to require being Microsoft ’ s outdoor tents pole for the rest of this year. When Chris Pirillo is against you (kind of), who can be for you?
Microsoft has the regrettable tendency of doing two things during launch. First, they overhype and overshare, creating a bonfire of enjoyment that is immediately extinguished. Then they release things that were designed by a committee of people committed to their very own causes. The compatibility guys wish the computer (Atwood retorts: “ Yeah, yeah, it doesn ’ t run x86 applications. So your cherished copy of Windows Landscape Designer 1998 won ’ t run on Area RT. You ’ ll requirement to hang around a few months for Surface Pro to do that, however you ’ ll pay the Intel Premium ™ in rate, battery life, and size. ”) The UI fiends desire Metro front and center. The marketing guys want an iPad. The Office people desire back compatibility with Multi-Tool Word For Xenix. Then they all rest and do work not associated with the end objective. For instance, the evaluators ’ overview to Windows Phone, introduced concurrently with Win8, was about 275 web pages. That ’ s many of a group ’ s summertime. Possibly those man hours would be much better served in getting the real Area to market at a Surface RT cost?
In short, Microsoft understands the PC industry is tepid at best. Aside from the arms races in monetary computing and gaming, there is extremely little to oblige the normal user to upgrade. Win8 will certainly meet most of that compunction however by launching an item that wasn ’ t a sign of its strengths is a big issue. Looky-loos and tire kickers will certainly see every person from Pogue to Burns stating that the Surface is terrific however it isn ’ t and they ’ ll be frightened for a minimum of two hardware generations. Then fanboys will flame posts like this one and attempt to justify their acquisition till they concede, quietly, that this wasn ’ t the non-Droid they were searching for.
The same, arguably, can be said for the original iPhone. It was weird-looking, had no applications, and was usually underpowered. Nevertheless, as a first-gen item it defined the method forward. The Surface RT, on the other hand, defines the bottom end of the Win8 platform and, as every country vocalist understands, you don ’ t start out your set with an unfortunate tune … you start with a barn burner.
Incoming search terms:
Samsung set the bar a little lower than the last mark when it told investors its expectations earlier this month, posting $ 7.4 billion in operating revenues for Q3 and $ 5.97 billion in net earnings.
Incoming search terms:
Intel discharged their 2012Q2 incomes today, stating revenue of $ 13.5 billion, up 5 % from last quarter. COMPUTER market growth rose 3 % to $ 8.7 billion. Intel blamed the slow-down on individuals awaiting Windows 8 prior to investing in new hardware.
The Information Center group saw revenue of $ 2.8 billion. Intel ’ s incomes per share were flat, rising 1 cent over last quarter.
The business is currently dealing with a number of opponents consisting of mobile chipsets from Qualcomm and Nvidia. 2011 was a bad year for Intel with computer sales rising a simple 1.8 %. Nevertheless, with the intro of Windows 8 later on this year, experts expect sales to rise 5 % in October.
Intel closed flat at 25.38 per share this afternoon. Quotes expected 52 cents a share with income of $ 13.56 billion, according to Reuters.
Incoming search terms:
- powered by SMF az science center
- powered by SMF apple computer sales
- powered by SMF regional help wanted
- powered by phpBB apple computer games
- powered by vBulletin apple computer games
- powered by phpBB apple computers
- powered by phpBB az science center
Quite a bit hangs on the horizon in the world of gadgets. E3 is right around the corner, as is WWDC (Apple’s Developer conference), and while hardware gets cooler and cooler, the spec does not.
John, Matt and I discuss this and more in this week’s TC/Gadgets webcast.
As far as WWDC expectations go, the debate currently centers around docks and displays. Matt seems to think that a 4-inch display on a Droid X-sized iPhone is in the works, while I’m hoping against hope that a larger display can fit onto the same size iPhone. John, as usual, doesn’t really care. He’s more interested in the docks — rumors are circulating that suggest a microUSB port on the new iPhone rather than Apple’s standard 30-pin connector.
This would, of course, leave hundreds of speaker and charging docks out in the cold, with the exception that Apple releases John’s suggested $ 39.99 iDong.
We also discussed what we expect out of E3, which amounts to little more than nothing. No new Xbox, no new PlayStation. Basically, we’re getting our hands on the Wii U, which is exciting, but there’s only so much that can be upgraded in current hardware.
Which leads right into our next point: how important are specs?
Matt wrote a post recently harshing on the Nexus tablet for a lack of wireless connectivity, but more importantly, detailing the insignificance of performance testing and specs. To his first point, John and I both own WiFi-only iPads and are perfectly content, whereas Matt needs data to survive.
As far as specs are concerned, we seem to agree on the idea that specs are important in a few select areas, like camera and display. But without a solid understanding of what they mean, and how they can be unrepresentative, they’re just as worthless as a processor clock speed. For example, Nokia’s 808 Pureview 41-megapixel camera doesn’t take 41-megapixel pictures. It rather captures around 40 megapixels of raw data which is then compressed into an incredibly sharp 8-meagpixel image.
In the same vein, display resolution is only a worth looking at alongside display size. The idea is to have a high resolution on a smaller screen. The bigger the display, the less pixel dense the resolution is.
We spent a good deal of this webcast arguing, so feel free to join the fight in the comments.
Incoming search terms:
The Intel-AMD war has been going on a long time, and I hope it will be going on longer. The last few years have been hard on the underdog, however, with huge growth by Intel in both the low-power and high-performance sectors. The Core 2 Duos excelled, as did the Core i* series, and its most recent consumer series, the Sandy Bridge update to the i*s, is a monster. AMD has consistently lagged behind, though from the other side of the table you might say they’ve been nipping at Intel’s heels quite effectively for years.
Bulldozer was supposed to be the platform that finally brought them up to speed, but it’s been delayed for a long time, and now it’s launching to less than stellar reviews.
I’ve skimmed through Anand’s thorough-as-usual review, and the conclusion is that it’s just not competitive. HardOCP, PC Perspective, Tom’s Hardware, and Neoseeker agree. Whether it’s synthetic or real-world testing, AMD’s best FX processors don’t stand up to the middle of Intel’s line, or even to their own processors from last year.
Is it a disaster? Not exactly: I’m guessing at some point along the line, someone at AMD said “look, we have to release something sometime. Our customers aren’t going to wait forever.” And despite the fact that they have many improvements waiting in the wings (according to a roadmap AMD shared, presumably as a sort of covert apology), they went to market with the processors they had.
Unfortunately, despite the new architecture and insane transistor count (the 8-core 8150 has around 2 billion), performance and efficiency per core just plain isn’t that good. There are a few tests on which Bulldozer takes on Sandy Bridge well, such as those truly optimized for high core counts, but on single-core tasks it gets destroyed.
There’s hope: this is just the first iteration of the new architecture, and it’s likely we’ll see both a new line and a serious performance boost when Windows 8 hits. In the meantime, while the Bulldozer processors provide decent performance for a good price, no one seems to have found a good reason to buy one other than that they’re not Intel.
If you do decide to buy, get the 8120. It’s the same silicon as the 8150, apparently, but the better-testing samples are getting 8150 branding and a higher stock clock speed. If you don’t mind a doing the overclocking yourself, you can save $ 50 by going with the 8120 and giving it a little boost.
Xbox 360′s Kinect, PS3′s Move Still Seeing ‘Limited Expectations,’ says Analyst
Ever since GDC and E3 this year, the hype train has been really building for the respective motion control solutions from Microsoft and Sony. The latter is about to launch its much talked about PlayStation Move this week, while Microsoft is set to kick off the Kinect launch in November.
Read more on Business Insider
News: SEGA’s Rise of Nightmare for Kinect
“Wake up to a new wave of horror.” SEGA’s Rise of Nightmare has been announced exclusively for Xbox 360 Kinect. A trailer was shown at Microsoft’s 2010 Tokyo Game Show conference. Ellie Gibson, our woman on the ground, glimpsed flashes of zombies, people being hacked to pieces and a man strapped to a bed. Screaming was heard in the background. “Wake up… to a new wave of horror,” teased the …
Read more on Eurogamer
Xbox hopes to Kinect with Japanese market
Battling its Japanese gaming rivals on their home turf hasn’t been easy for Microsoft Corp. Its Xbox 360 game console runs a…
Read more on Deseret News
Cec talks about what she expects to come from Microsoft Kinect. This product has the potential to knock the Nintendo Wii straight off the market, and change w=the way we see the Xbox 360 console. It’s important that she product has no problems during or after launch, as Microsoft will lose masses of sales and valuable customers.
Take another look at the kinect shit. Pay attention, be critical, and you will see massive holes. Do the same at the Sony conference. break things down, ask questions, make sure you can really see Move’s full use in the games you love…. not just how you’d like to think it will work.
Lithium-ion battery technology keeps improving by (theoretical) leaps and bounds, but what good’s that to you when you’re faced with a dead TV remote? Brother Industries has a plan, and it doesn’t involve ink for once — the Japanese printer company’s developed a set of prototype batteries you simply shake to charge. AA and AAA models are already in the works, though you shouldn’t expect to slot them into cameras or R/C cars, as the miniature electromagnetic induction generators inside are designed for infrequently used gadgets and provide as little as 10mW (or as much as 180mW) when shook. Of course, when it comes to TV remotes there’s an even lazier way for couch potatoes to squeeze the juice, but we have to imagine standard-sized cells have a slightly better chance at market.
Permalink| | Email this | Comments
Props to Engadget