Question by Morgan Shatee’ Byers: do you agree that artificial intelligence installed on robotics is in fact a human specie?

Best answer:

Answer by oldherb50
No? Because robots are not humans by definition with or without AI, and humans are a species so there cannot be a “human specie” implying a different type of human, your either human or something else.

What do you think? Answer below!

Related Posts:

• Is it possoble for me to learn, theoritical physics, applied mathematics, robotics, artificial intelligence an?
• i want to know about artificial intelligence and robotics.?
• Will artificial intelligence, advanced robotics, and other technologies make humans labor obsolete.?
• Is matlab and simulink used in artificial intelligence and robotics and expert systems?
• NASA auctioning off three sets of patents covering software development, robotics, and artificial intelligence

The FTC has accepted a settlement with Facebook after charging it with misleading users about just how exclusive their information would certainly be kept. Facebook accepted the modifications last year, and three Commissioners voted in favor of it after a period of public opinion, with one dissenting and one not taking part. Now, Facebook will be working to protect against exactly what Mark Zuckerberg formerly called “a small number of high profile blunders” from happening again by agreeing to “plainly disclose” any type of third-party details that could be shared and calling for the user’s consent, not simply general arrangement with a privacy policy.

Facebook’s privacy need to also be examined by a 3rd party every 2 years for a total of 20 years, and the FTC …

Continue reading & hellip;

Incoming search terms:

• Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups latest funny jokes
• Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups short funny jokes
• Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups physics of apollo missions

Related Posts:

• Facebook responds to Home privacy concerns, specifies what it will and won’t know
• Bing Tags broaden reach with public results, extend beyond Facebook friends
• Facebook security hole allows anyone to view private New Year’s Midnight Delivery messages and photos
• European student activist group preparing to take Facebook to court due to privacy concerns
• After Facebook privacy snafu, FTC may force companies to admit wrongdoing even if they settle

Boxee normally does not get along with the existing media / pay-TV conglomerates, however now it’s telling the FCC it has pertained to a contract with Comcast. The solution agreed to lets live TV-friendly Boxee access encrypted standard cable television channels thanks to a DLNA-controlled hd digital transportation adapter that would link to the box through Ethernet, with an eye towards no longer needing an adapter at all down the road. Multichannel News quotes Boxee CEO Avner Ronen as saying it was “great to deal with Comcast” on an offer that offers third parties like his company continued access to fundamental cable television. The benefit for Comcast and some other cable television business is that they can progress with encrypted all-digital options that might open up bandwidth for things like greater rate web, something Boxee was arguing against formerly. What this implies for existing standards like CableCARD or the long awaited AllVid is not clear, however if it’s one action closer to a genuine choice to ditching the cable box, we’ll take it.

Boxee, Comcast accept a workaround for encrypted basic cable television channels on 3rd party boxes originally appeared on Engadget on Sunlight, 01 Jul 2012 00:44:00 EDT. Please see our terms for usage of feeds.

PermalinkMultichannel News|Letter to FCC from Comcast / Boxee|Email this|Comments

Incoming search terms:

• Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups cable tv sound on computer
• Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups satellite dish tv receiver
• Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups nature sweet
• Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups return to arms cheats
• powered by SMF christmas music streaming audio
• powered by SMF audio advantage
• powered by SMF comcast business class
• powered by SMF tv receiver box
• powered by SMF 2 0 playstation2 cheats please
• Powered by Article Dashboard comcast business class

Related Posts:

• Comcast to encrypt basic cable channels, require set-top box for all content
• FCC to allow encryption of basic cable, with a few strings that Boxee approves of
• FCC will allow encryption of basic cable, offers measures to protect open access
• Pace’s XG1 cable box runs TiVo software and records six channels
• Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Cablevision, And Others Will Share Wi-Fi Hot Spots

Question by intestinal mucous: long post but worth reading quoted from a user here. do you agree with this statement??
before you answer you have to drop any preconceived notions for or against feminism. i agree with a lot of it. i also think that women deserve equal pay and are equal in every way to men.

This will go against almost all you have been taught to believe about men and women for the past pathetic 60 years. But, having lived through this, I see just how true it is and how it was done

Feminism is a grotesque fraud perpetrated on society by the governing elite. It is designed to weaken the American social and cultural fabric in order to introduce a “friendly” fascist New World Order. Its advocates are sanctimonious charlatans who have grown rich and powerful from it. They include a whole class of liars and moral cripples who work for the elite in various capacities: government, education and the media. These imposters ought to be exposed and ridiculed. Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem were NOT what they were presented to be.

We were taught to abandon our femininity and challenge men for the masculine role. Wewere told heterosexuality and family by nature is oppressive to women. Domestic violence was publicized to trample woman’s tender tendrils of trust. As a result, the divorce rate doubled and the birth rate was cut in half. One third of all births are now out-of-wedlock. The ability to commit to a relationship is almost unheard of among the young. Today they “hook up” and move on. Men are reduced to no more than dogs urinating on women as if they were hydrants. How often have I heard a single mother refer to her ex as a “sperm donor”? But no one is at fault here, we are ALL VICTIMS. Men, women, children all.

Not all women need to marry and have children but the vast majority do. We are a bonding species. Children represent our organic growth. As recently as fifty years ago, the role of wife and mother was honored. After 1960, society was subjected to the vicious campaign of social engineering designed to disparage these roles and make women seek fulfillment in career instead. We got caught up in the fun of burning our bras and being led by the evil ones.

Led by the Rockefeller Foundation, this media campaign was made to look spontaneous and “modern.” In fact, the goal was to decrease the birth rate and destabilize society by pitting men against women. Divide and conquer. The other reason for the feminist action was so that the bankers could CHARGE DOUBLE THE INCOME TAX on a family. With two working members there was more to steal by their dishonest tax laws. (These people, NOT our governments, own the Federal Reserve). Aaron Russo discusses this in this short flick:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=…

Feminism has done untold damage to civilization. There is no more fundamental yet delicate relationship in society than male and female. On it depends the family, the red blood cell of society. Nobody with the interests of society at heart would try to divide men and women. Yet the lie that men have exploited women has become the official orthodoxy. The lie that they cheat is part of the propaganda machine. Man loves woman. His first instinct is to nurture (“husband”) and see her thrive. When a woman is happy, she is beautiful. Sure, some men are abusive, but the vast majority are good decent men who have supported and guided their families for millennium. This is why men were so much stronger in character in days gone by. Feminism has robbed them of their rightful position in society. They are not given many opportunities to develop these traits. Abuse is up because these men are frustrated by the termination of their natural tendencies to nurture. No excuses but this is a contributing factor.

The Rockefeller’s cruel regime has tricked women into forgetting that they are part of a natural cycle, and the ages of 18-25 are critical to starting a family. In the same way as the apple tree blossoms in the spring, young women need to marry and have children when nature intended. The Rockefellers want women and men to miss the opportunity to start strong families that will protect them from enslavement by the state.

All of this is calculated to create personal confusion and sow chaos among heterosexuals. As a result, millions of American males are emasculated and divorced from their relationship to family (the world and the future.) The American woman has been hoodwinked into investing herself in a meaningless mundane career instead of the timeless love of her husband and children. Many women have become temperamentally unfit to be wives and mothers.

People who are isolated and alone, stunted and love-starved, are easy to fool and manipulate. Without the healthy influence of two loving parents, so are their children. When both parents work, the children are exposed to government propaganda and manipulation from even younger ages.

Women’s oppression is a lie. Sex roles were never as rigid as feminists would have us believe. My mother had a successful business in the 1940’s as a private nurse. When my father’s income increased, she was content to quit and concentrate on the children. Women were free to pursue careers if they wanted to. The difference was that their role as wife and mother was understood, and socially validated, as it should be. Yet Stay at home mothers, both Christian and Muslim, are jeered and considered patsies by their more militant sisters.

Sex is an act of possession. You cannot be possessed by many men and ever belong to one. The ability to love/trust dies. The sex act is sacred. It is the ritual enactment of the Act of Creation. The man selects and prepares the special ground and plants his seed. The woman receives and nurtures it. Ultimately, a child is the fruit of love. Sex is an uplifting experience in this loving context. Today women and men settle for so much less. Careless sharing of our flesh has almost killed this concept today. Our children and grandchildren suffer.

We were told to be “smarter, better, faster” than the men we met. This is now echoed in “girl power” as boys are being marginalized in society. No longer does a woman seek a man she can naturally look up to, respect and trust. They waste time on the emotionally immature boys that men have been molded into. Men want power; women want love. Heterosexual union involves the exchange of the two: female power (in the worldly sense) for male love (his power expressed as love.)Two people don’t become one by fighting over the same territory.

It is almost impossible to find a man with a powerful positive vision of life with a central place for a wife in these days. Homosexuality has seriously affected the balance between men in women in numbers. Men have to know what they want, provide leadership and earn trust. The man “makes the house, the woman makes the home. This complementary division of labor is natural. Women need to remember how to be a homemaker and mother. Why do you think fast foods and easy bake junk was promoted until most women have forgotten the basics?

Once the power-for-love arrangement is established, sex roles don’t have to be rigid. The key is that a wife is willing to be First Mate to her Captain because he loves her, looks after her interests and is totally loyal. After that, who does what can be dictated by respective preferences, abilities and practical considerations.

While this was done to women, men were dumbed down and taught rebellion was coooool More separation from healthy mainstream attitudes. They were drugged and mind altered through the hippy days. They were taught a man has no responsibility to a woman because she is willing to give it away. “Free love” was NOT free. And so here we are.

Personally I feel RIPPED OFF. I believed this crap that was fed to us so insidiously. In doing so I lived a life I would not have chosen had I known better!

I hope I have expressed myself well. Feminism brought a few positive changes. But when you weight the good against the bad you will find, it was all a big sham created by the CIA, the Rockefellers and the Communist women who led us straight to hell.

Source(s):

http://www.rense.com/general74/fem.htm…..

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/evils%20i…

http://www.rense.com/general66/fath.htm….

http://www.newswatchmagazine.org/weekly_…

http://www.savethemales.ca/031001.html…..

http://www.savethemales.ca/000499.html…..

http://www.savethemales.ca/000441.html…..

http://www.savethemales.ca/archives.html…

This is a wonderful site
since feminism divorce rates have been shot up drasticaly and its usualy the women who make the choice. and they try to suck the men dry for all there worth. i am a divorce lawyer and see this ALOT. id say that 40 % of the time its due to feminist ideaology. the rest is other things such as abuse cheating etc.

Best answer:

Answer by babydragonspawn
That was the biggest load of crap I have ever heard in my life! and that’s all I’m gonna say… other wise really bad words will come out and I’ll get blocked.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Incoming search terms:

• powered by vBulletin robots business class travel - business class airfares tickets flights
• Powered by Article Dashboard business class travel
• powered by vBulletin business class discount
• Powered by Article Dashboard federal business opportunities

Related Posts:

• Play This Hypnotic And Free New Game From The Creator Of Minecraft
• Judge rules that Motorola’s patents aren’t worth the $4 billion a year it demanded from Microsoft
• This is the Modem World: When tech can’t save us from road rage
• This is the Modem World: When tech can’t save us from road rage
• FAA may ease ‘reading device’ restriction during takeoff and landing later this year

What’s the best way to deter a thief? Ruin the spoils, of course. Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile and Sprint have agreed to a broad outline that will culminate in the creation of a central database for stolen cellphones. The goal? To block lifted units from functioning on US shores. Over the next six months, each firm will build out its own stolen device database for integration into a larger, central database, said a Wall Street Journal source, with regional carriers joining the effort over the following two years.

“We are working toward an industry wide solution to address the complexity of blocking stolen devices from being activated on ours or another network with a new SIM card,” said a T-Mobile spokesperson, “This is not a simple problem to solve.” The quartet of wireless providers hope to imitate the success UK carriers have seen with similar efforts. With any luck, the program will put an end to massive phone-heists and the awkward public relations stunts that imitate them.

US carriers agree to build stolen phone database, blacklist hot handsets originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:29:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  Wall Street Journal  | Email this | Comments

Incoming search terms:

• Powered by Article Dashboard current science events articles

Related Posts:

• White House responds to phone unlock petition: ‘we agree with you’
• Orange Ramps Up Own-Brand Range With 3 More Android Handsets, And Its First LTE Device, Has Sights On Windows Phone
• Orange Ramps Up Own-Brand Range With 3 Even more Android Handsets, And Its First LTE Gadget, Has Sights On Windows Phone
• HTC Windows Phone 8S offer great build quality
• Bloomberg: HTC backing away from plan to build five-inch Windows Phone

Major ISPs agree to FCC’s code of conduct on botnets, DNS attacks originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:13:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink ThreatPost  |  FCC (PDF)  | Email this | Comments

Related Posts:

• Menlo Park council candidate proposes campaign finance limits, code of conduct
• Youtube Code of Conduct ” UpDownMostly “
• Youtube Code of Conduct ” for Muslims and others of course “
• Home Console Gaming May Suffer Death By A Thousand Cuts, Rather Than A Major Revolution
• EA confirms 10 percent of staff laid off in major restructuring

Question by Wizard: Does anyone agree or disagree with this about the concept of robotics?
Majoring in Robotics is not as good as majoring in Electrical engineering or Mechanical engineering because Robotics teaches us to make our machines and technology mimic human form to be considered useful, it’s possible to make the exact same thing not in a form resembling a human for example, it would therefor not look like a robot, but it would do the exact same thing. What reason is there to desire to make everything look and mimic the human form to be ideal or acceptable or useful to us ?

Best answer:

Answer by Nicholas
I don’t believe the main goal of robotics is to mimic human form but instead to perform tasks for humans. The motivation to create a robots can be extremely varied such as the task being too unsafe, the task being to boring, the task being to complex, etc. In many of these situations the robot can’t be just like a human because humans are inadequate.

I think most engineers would agree with me that the simplest solution is usually the best solution. Humans are quite complex and while they can inspire engineering during robot design they have many unnecessary systems that are not needed in every application. The majority of the robots out their are very simple and are very distant from the human form. Take a cd player for instance. It is a robot. It is nothing like a human and a human couldn’t perform the task.

There is definitely a push to get more generic robots that can do anything a human can giving them greater utility in unforeseen situations. The implication of a robot being able to do everything a human can do is immense. Imagine a robot that can clean and organize you house and cook you food and drive to the store and restock your frig. You wouldn’t have to pay the robot anything except electricity. In a situation like this a robot would have to be of the human form to allow it to use things that we use. This, however, is just a small niche in robots. Very few people make money trying to make this type of robot.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Incoming search terms:

• Powered by Article Dashboard electrical engineering technology jobs
• powered by SMF mechanical engineering

Related Posts:

• Does anyone know about high school robotics?
• Does anyone remember this cartoon show with a robot and 3 teens?
• What Is Different About This Explosion?
• Watch this: Stephen Colbert learns just how much data politicians have about him
• Is this a good masters degree for robotics?